small dog breeds/dogs suitable for an apartment (update p 6)

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
Ronbo
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: off key, mostly

Post by Ronbo »

s1m0n wrote:
Walden wrote:]Of course many of those songbirds are also non-native invasive species, as well. The Shakespeare Society purposely released various species mentioned in the Bard's works, in the 19th Century, with devastating effects on some NA species.
Only two of the released species prospered, and only one (the starling) has become a menace.
Wasn't the english sparrow an introduced species? It is very damaging to bluebirds and other established hole-nesters. As a matter of fact, both species can be killed with impunity, as opposed to all songbird species.
User avatar
s1m0n
Posts: 10069
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:17 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: The Inside Passage

Post by s1m0n »

Ronbo wrote: Wasn't the english sparrow an introduced species? It is very damaging to bluebirds and other established hole-nesters. As a matter of fact, both species can be killed with impunity, as opposed to all songbird species.
Yes, the House Sparrow / Weaver Finch is an introduced species in North America. I dunno who dunnit, however. Wikipedia says "as pest control", but doesn't say anything about shakespeare.
And now there was no doubt that the trees were really moving - moving in and out through one another as if in a complicated country dance. ('And I suppose,' thought Lucy, 'when trees dance, it must be a very, very country dance indeed.')

C.S. Lewis
User avatar
Ronbo
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: off key, mostly

Post by Ronbo »

s1m0n wrote:
Ronbo wrote: Wasn't the english sparrow an introduced species? It is very damaging to bluebirds and other established hole-nesters. As a matter of fact, both species can be killed with impunity, as opposed to all songbird species.
Yes, the House Sparrow / Weaver Finch is an introduced species in North America. I dunno who dunnit, however. Wikipedia says "as pest control", but doesn't say anything about shakespeare.
English sparrow is just another name for the house sparrow, among many unprintable ones from bluebird enthusiasts.
User avatar
s1m0n
Posts: 10069
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:17 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: The Inside Passage

Post by s1m0n »

Ronbo wrote: English sparrow is just another name for the house sparrow, among many unprintable ones from bluebird enthusiasts.
Sorry; I was trying to agree with your post while adding a couple of extra names.
And now there was no doubt that the trees were really moving - moving in and out through one another as if in a complicated country dance. ('And I suppose,' thought Lucy, 'when trees dance, it must be a very, very country dance indeed.')

C.S. Lewis
Jack
Posts: 15580
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: somewhere, over the rainbow, and Ergoville, USA

Post by Jack »

gonzo914 wrote:
Cranberry wrote:I have success with lots of animals. It's just that one turtle I accidentally killed.
And dead Bridgette the Goldfish

And dead Mary Baker Eddy, also a goldfish.

And "accidentally killed" is a bit of an understatement. You dashed his guts out on a rock and left him there for the crows to pick at his eyes.
Call me cold-hearted, but goldfish seem like a different matter from a dog.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38239
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Post by Nanohedron »

s1m0n wrote:
Ronbo wrote: Wasn't the english sparrow an introduced species? It is very damaging to bluebirds and other established hole-nesters. As a matter of fact, both species can be killed with impunity, as opposed to all songbird species.
Yes, the House Sparrow / Weaver Finch is an introduced species in North America. I dunno who dunnit, however. Wikipedia says "as pest control", but doesn't say anything about shakespeare.
A quasi-romantic lore has it that eight pair were released by homesick immigrants pining for familiar things from the Old Country - I suppose house sparrows would have been cheap enough for that sort of thing, but why go to the greater expense of shipping pests? But apparently this story is just that: lore. Although the initial "eight pair" part is right, it seems the reality was far less one of careless nostalgia than calculation; this from 50birds.com:
Eight pair were brought to the U.S. in 1850 for the purpose of ridding the shade trees of inch worms and in the spring of 1851 Nicholas Pike and other directors of the Brooklyn Institute released them in Brooklyn, New York. They did not survive. Nevertheless, destiny was on the side of the hoard and Pike arranged for the importation of one hundred more which were released in 1852 and 1853.

In 1854 Colonel Rhodes imported and released some of the birds in Portland Maine and some in Quebec. In the next ten years, a few hundred more were imported and released in Quebec and the areas around Portland, Boston and New York.
In 1869, about one thousand were released in Philadelphia. They were released in San Francisco, Cleveland, Cincinnati, St. Louis and several other cities in the interior. Between 1874 and 1876 a few were released in Jackson and Owosso, Michigan and in 1881 they were introduced in Iowa.
The more...um...editorial comments have been left aside.

BTW, "English sparrow" is something of a misnomer, as the species' oldest known native habitats were in Eurasia and Africa, and they spread from there.

This will be a vastly more entertaining post if you reread it in a Cliff Claven voice.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
Jack
Posts: 15580
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: somewhere, over the rainbow, and Ergoville, USA

Post by Jack »

It's probably just because I've been reading a bunch of Ayn Rand for a philosophy class, but that's how the House Sparrow strikes me: as a kind of Ayn Rand. It aims for success, achieves it, kills many others on its way there, and doesn't care.
User avatar
Ronbo
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: off key, mostly

Post by Ronbo »

s1m0n wrote:
Ronbo wrote: English sparrow is just another name for the house sparrow, among many unprintable ones from bluebird enthusiasts.
Sorry; I was trying to agree with your post while adding a couple of extra names.
No problem from me. I am always glad to learn something new. They are properly called house sparrows. I have just been calling them english sparrows for so long, that the name pops up before anything else. Darned birds seem to have as many names as Irish tunes sometimes.
User avatar
Ronbo
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: off key, mostly

Post by Ronbo »

Cranberry wrote:It's probably just because I've been reading a bunch of Ayn Rand for a philosophy class, but that's how the House Sparrow strikes me: as a kind of Ayn Rand. It aims for success, achieves it, kills many others on its way there, and doesn't care.
If that is what you are getting from reading Ayn Rand, you are missing most of what she is writing about. You would do well to read her books a little more carefully. And be prepared to put in some sweat to find out what she is really saying.
Jack
Posts: 15580
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: somewhere, over the rainbow, and Ergoville, USA

Post by Jack »

Ronbo wrote:
Cranberry wrote:It's probably just because I've been reading a bunch of Ayn Rand for a philosophy class, but that's how the House Sparrow strikes me: as a kind of Ayn Rand. It aims for success, achieves it, kills many others on its way there, and doesn't care.
If that is what you are getting from reading Ayn Rand, you are missing most of what she is writing about. You would do well to read her books a little more carefully. And be prepared to put in some sweat to find out what she is really saying.
I'm reading for assignment, not pleasure reading (I don't see how you could read such a thing for pleasure, personally). I"m told to remember and regurgitate X, so that's what I try to do. :P

Chirp, chirp.
User avatar
Redwolf
Posts: 6051
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Somewhere in the Western Hemisphere

Post by Redwolf »

s1m0n wrote:
dwest wrote: Sorry, but there is no justification for free roaming Felis silvestris catus the only terrestrial predator that kills just for fun other than Homo ambulens.
Great Horned Owls and Barred Owls like kitties though.
Coyotes, too. Songbird breeding success rates are much higher in cities with a substantial urban coyote population that they are in cities where there are few or no coyotes. The reason is that coyotes keep the cat population down or close to home, and that cuts down substantially on the toll cats take on birds.
Here in the Santa Cruz Mountains, we refer to free-roaming cats as "coyote chow." :lol:

Redwolf
...agus déanfaidh mé do mholadh ar an gcruit a Dhia, a Dhia liom!
User avatar
Lambchop
Posts: 5768
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:10 pm
antispam: No
Location: Florida

Post by Lambchop »

Cranberry wrote:
gonzo914 wrote:
Cranberry wrote:I have success with lots of animals. It's just that one turtle I accidentally killed.
And dead Bridgette the Goldfish

And dead Mary Baker Eddy, also a goldfish.

And "accidentally killed" is a bit of an understatement. You dashed his guts out on a rock and left him there for the crows to pick at his eyes.
Call me cold-hearted, but goldfish seem like a different matter from a dog.
You will find a dog to be such a burdensome chore-meister that your opinion will change quickly. It will be an easy matter to think of it as something you need to euthanize, much like those goldfish. Tropical fish. Bettas. Rats.

Spare the animals and get some counseling.
Cotelette d'Agneau
User avatar
Whistlin'Dixie
Posts: 2281
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: It's too darn hot!

Post by Whistlin'Dixie »

Respectfully:

don't do it (although I am sure you will argue this one into the ground)

just the fact that you are young, "ill", have no family support, are single, in college, live in an apartment, don't have much resources, gosh, what else?????

be happy with your snake, it doesn't need attention, only needs to be fed occasionally, doesn't need to be cleaned up after very often and you can leave it alone when you are bored with it.

This is not to diminish anyone here who has encouraged you, or you yourself. Just PLEASE think this one through

(my college age son just picked up a kitten. he has brought it home innumerable times for vet visits already, *paid for by Mom* and it is coming home with him in March so it can be spayed. He loves his kitten, but if something ever came up, I WOULD KEEP IT FOR HIM!!!!! I am not opposed to pets of any kind, but I am IN A POSITION TO CARE FOR THEM. I love animals, was a biology major, and we already have many pets at our house. Just not a dog. Too much work)

M
dwest
Posts: 7113
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:13 am

Post by dwest »

:boggle:
Last edited by dwest on Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jack
Posts: 15580
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: somewhere, over the rainbow, and Ergoville, USA

Post by Jack »

Thank you everybody. I really do appreciate it. If I still do get a dog (it's looking more unlikely) I will be really informed.
Post Reply