"No way, that bottom D is spot on at 293.7 Hz exactly...nothing even remotely flat there."
Hmm, well something sounds dodgy there to my ears. Doesn't sound in tune with the other notes. Strange. I am the only one who hears this and dares to speak up. Doth I blaspheme perchance
If you have a serious question on the Chanter Ben will answer it. He does not have Email however so you will have to call him at his shop.
802.229.0315 (Shop)
Hmm...it may indeed be off, its difficult to tell precisely (for me) as the low-quality recording (sorry Paul..no offense intended!) sounded quite distorted. Rather than go through the subjective "sounds to me" I just ran it through my pc tuner and noted the Hertz ratings when the sampling rate was able to pick up individual notes.
By all means, the best solution would be to ask B.K. himself.
"Hmm...it may indeed be off, its difficult to tell precisely (for me) as the low-quality recording (sorry Paul..no offense intended!) sounded quite distorted. Rather than go through the subjective "sounds to me" I just ran it through my pc tuner and noted the Hertz ratings when the sampling rate was able to pick up individual notes" D.
"If you have a serious question on the Chanter Ben will answer it ..." Wizz
The bottom note is off to my ears - there is no hard D, that's what sounds "strange" when you'd normally expect it to be there, but it's not. As stated earlier it's probably been fixed/adjusted by now - I have no other serious questions about the chanter. Again fair play to Ben for helping out
Perhaps the sound is off due to a). amount of compression required to to be able to broadcast on the net, b). some loss or transmission errors during broadcast over the net. I would not trust any lossy recording format like mp3 or mp4 over the net.
djm
I'd rather be atop the foothills than beneath them.
This sounds like a great chanter.
The body of it looks like a Leo Rowsome chanter that Mick O'Brien used to have, similar turning, that is
Sounds a bit like it too.
I just had my ears de-waxed and I can hear a hard D fine. In fact theres a few.
And the big long D that the tune ends on, thats hard.
I'm sure whoever buys it will be happy for years to come.
Best of luck to Jerry too!
Tommy
What do you call a "D" with a flick-knife and a leather jacket?
A "Hard D"
Ba-bum-tisch
Yes folks we're here all week..........
Steampacket wrote:Hmm, well something sounds dodgy there to my ears.
I hear two dodgy things going on, and neither have anything to do with the chanter. The first is lossy digital compression artifacting (lending that dizzy, swimmy feeling) and the second is comb filtering from recording in a small, reflective room. Both could veil one's perception of pitch, especially on something as rich in overtones as a hard D. For the chanter to still sound this good through all the murky soup, I'll bet the real thing would knock your socks off.
TPipes wrote:What do you call a "D" with a flick-knife and a leather jacket?
A "Hard D"
Actually, there was these two brothers, boys actually, and they used to get into these suspicious moods, and they'd investigate, and then they'd get into all these adventures ....
djm
Last edited by djm on Fri Jul 23, 2004 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'd rather be atop the foothills than beneath them.
All good points above - but maybe it's one of those things - you had to be there for. There were 4 digital processes before the video was published, it was recorded on video tape on a consumer product - Panasonic Mini DV - with the on-camera microphone. This is not meant for a detailed critique by ANY stretch. The purpose, fellows, is to have a basic listen to a chanter played in living colour by one of our extraordinarily talented contemporaries. Did y'all notice the second octave?? Guys, and Girls, this one will be one to remember, trust me. It'll make your liver quiver and your spine shiver