Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 1:11 pm
I think its a gas to watch them raise their eyebrows in unison. I could spend hours doing so....uh...er...yup, gotta go.
https://forums.chiffandfipple.com/
Couldn't you make a form or a mandrel to heat-shrink tubing on?DMQuinn wrote:
The only way to get as good a fit with a cylindrical ferrule as can be had with a conical one is to heat it up and allow it to shrink down in place. That is too risky, especially with a thin wall of ebony, which is notorious for being sensitive to heat.
What good would it do on a mandrel?WannabePiper wrote:Couldn't you make a form or a mandrel to heat-shrink tubing on?DMQuinn wrote:
The only way to get as good a fit with a cylindrical ferrule as can be had with a conical one is to heat it up and allow it to shrink down in place. That is too risky, especially with a thin wall of ebony, which is notorious for being sensitive to heat.
To protect and support the mandrel, of course! :roll:DMQuinn wrote:What good would it do on a mandrel?WannabePiper wrote:Couldn't you make a form or a mandrel to heat-shrink tubing on?
I really can't answer this. I am only sure about the few makers that have already been mentioned in this string.Joseph E. Smith wrote:Mr. Quinn, do you have a ball-park figure/idea what percentage of contemporary pipe makers use hand rolled tubing as opposed to pre-rolled tubing. I realize to nail down an exact percentage is a tricky thing, but in you experience, what would you say?